BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureBrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt HextrisNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, sourcedocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,437★ 13,121
First released20142017
ReplacesTetrisPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris if…

  • Trivial to host
  • Fun and polished
BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris and Nakama with Docker?

BrowserQuest Note - mozilla-bq alt Hextris: check the project docs for container support. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons