GNOME Calendar vs Baïkal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GNOME Calendar
Simple desktop calendar with CalDAV support
VS
Baïkal
Lightweight CalDAV and CardDAV server with web admin
| Feature | GNOME Calendar | Baïkal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Groupware |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | C | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 3,258 |
| First released | 2015 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar | Google Calendar, iCloud |
Why pick each one
Choose GNOME Calendar if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is GNOME Calendar or Baïkal better?
Neither is universally better. Baïkal has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GNOME Calendar and Baïkal free and open-source?
Yes. GNOME Calendar is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Baïkal under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GNOME Calendar and Baïkal with Docker?
GNOME Calendar: check the project docs for container support. Baïkal: yes.