EteSync vs Baïkal
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
EteSync
End-to-end encrypted sync for contacts and calendars
VS
Baïkal
Lightweight CalDAV and CardDAV server with web admin
| Feature | EteSync | Baïkal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,765 | ★ 3,258 |
| First released | 2017 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Google Calendar, iCloud | Google Calendar, iCloud |
Why pick each one
Choose EteSync if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is EteSync or Baïkal better?
Baïkal is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider EteSync if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are EteSync and Baïkal free and open-source?
Yes. EteSync is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Baïkal under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run EteSync and Baïkal with Docker?
EteSync: yes. Baïkal: yes.