WSO2 Identity Server vs Ipsilon
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
WSO2 Identity Server
Open-source identity and access management server
VS
Ipsilon
Identity provider for federated single sign-on
| Feature | WSO2 Identity Server | Ipsilon |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Java | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 870 | ★ 80 |
| First released | 2007 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Okta, ForgeRock | Okta, PingFederate |
Why pick each one
Choose WSO2 Identity Server if…
- Enterprise feature set
- Strong standards coverage
Frequently asked questions
Is WSO2 Identity Server or Ipsilon better?
Neither is universally better. WSO2 Identity Server has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are WSO2 Identity Server and Ipsilon free and open-source?
Yes. WSO2 Identity Server is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Ipsilon under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run WSO2 Identity Server and Ipsilon with Docker?
WSO2 Identity Server: yes. Ipsilon: check the project docs for container support.