Apache Syncope vs WSO2 Identity Server
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Apache Syncope
Open-source system for managing digital identities
VS
WSO2 Identity Server
Open-source identity and access management server
| Feature | Apache Syncope | WSO2 Identity Server |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 336 | ★ 870 |
| First released | 2012 | 2007 |
| Replaces | SailPoint, Okta | Okta, ForgeRock |
Why pick each one
Choose WSO2 Identity Server if…
- Enterprise feature set
- Strong standards coverage
Frequently asked questions
Is Apache Syncope or WSO2 Identity Server better?
Neither is universally better. WSO2 Identity Server has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Apache Syncope and WSO2 Identity Server free and open-source?
Yes. Apache Syncope is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WSO2 Identity Server under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Apache Syncope and WSO2 Identity Server with Docker?
Apache Syncope: yes. WSO2 Identity Server: yes.