GlitchTip vs Sentry
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GlitchTip
Open-source error tracking and performance monitoring
VS
Sentry
Application monitoring and error tracking platform
| Feature | GlitchTip | Sentry |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | BSL-1.1 |
| Language | Python | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,300 | ★ 9,486 |
| First released | 2020 | 2012 |
| Replaces | Sentry, Bugsnag | Bugsnag, Rollbar |
Why pick each one
Choose Sentry if…
- Released under the BSL-1.1 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 9.5k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is GlitchTip or Sentry better?
Neither is universally better. Sentry has the larger community, while GlitchTip is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are GlitchTip and Sentry free and open-source?
Yes. GlitchTip is licensed under MIT and Sentry under BSL-1.1. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GlitchTip and Sentry with Docker?
GlitchTip: yes. Sentry: yes.