Glitch-soc vs Streams
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Glitch-soc
Community-maintained Mastodon fork with extra features
VS
Streams
Decentralized social server with nomadic identity
| Feature | Glitch-soc | Streams |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 801 | ★ 100 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Twitter, Mastodon | Facebook, Mastodon |
Why pick each one
Choose Glitch-soc if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
Choose Streams if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is Glitch-soc or Streams better?
Neither is universally better. Glitch-soc has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Glitch-soc and Streams free and open-source?
Yes. Glitch-soc is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Streams under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Glitch-soc and Streams with Docker?
Glitch-soc: yes. Streams: yes.