Glitch-soc vs pump.io

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlitch-socpump.io
Deploy effortUnder-an-hour setupRead-the-docs project
Health score81 · Excellent48 · Fair
CategorySocial NetworksSocial Networks
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageRubyJavaScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 803★ 2,237
First released20172013
ReplacesTwitter, MastodonTwitter

What are Glitch-soc and pump.io?

Glitch-soc

Glitch-soc is a community-maintained fork of Mastodon that adds experimental features and customization options ahead of upstream. It federates fully with the rest of the fediverse over ActivityPub.

  • Extra customization options
  • Experimental features
  • Full fediverse federation
  • Themeable interface

pump.io

pump.io is a stream server that lets users post activities to their followers and to the web, implementing the Activity Streams format. It can be self-hosted as a personal social networking node.

  • Activity Streams social server
  • Personal social networking node
  • Federation support

Glitch-soc vs pump.io: key differences

Glitch-soc is written in Ruby, while pump.io is built with JavaScript. Licensing differs — AGPL-3.0 for Glitch-soc versus Apache-2.0 for pump.io. Pump.io is the lighter option, starting around 256 MB of RAM against 2,048 MB for Glitch-soc. Pump.io is the more established project (first released 2013), while Glitch-soc arrived in 2017. Pump.io has the considerably larger community, at 2,237 GitHub stars versus 803. Glitch-soc lists first-class Docker deployment; pump.io does not.

Why pick each one

Choose Glitch-soc if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Ruby
Glitch-soc details

Choose pump.io if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
pump.io details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glitch-soc or pump.io better?

pump.io is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Glitch-soc if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glitch-soc and pump.io free and open-source?

Yes. Glitch-soc is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pump.io under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glitch-soc and pump.io with Docker?

Glitch-soc: yes. pump.io: check the project docs for container support.

Which is lighter on resources, Glitch-soc or pump.io?

pump.io has the smaller minimum footprint at 256 MB of RAM, compared to about 2,048 MB for Glitch-soc. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.

Related comparisons