Glitch-soc vs pump.io
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Glitch-soc
Community-maintained Mastodon fork with extra features
VS
pump.io
Streams server for the social web
| Feature | Glitch-soc | pump.io |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Ruby | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 801 | ★ 2,239 |
| First released | 2017 | 2013 |
| Replaces | Twitter, Mastodon |
Why pick each one
Choose Glitch-soc if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Ruby
Choose pump.io if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Glitch-soc or pump.io better?
pump.io is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Glitch-soc if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Glitch-soc and pump.io free and open-source?
Yes. Glitch-soc is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pump.io under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Glitch-soc and pump.io with Docker?
Glitch-soc: yes. pump.io: check the project docs for container support.