GLAuth vs LLDAP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
GLAuth
Lightweight LDAP server for developers and small setups
VS
LLDAP
Lightweight LDAP server with a simple web interface
| Feature | GLAuth | LLDAP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,834 | ★ 6,421 |
| First released | 2017 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Active Directory, OpenLDAP | Active Directory, OpenLDAP |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is GLAuth or LLDAP better?
Neither is universally better. LLDAP has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are GLAuth and LLDAP free and open-source?
Yes. GLAuth is licensed under MIT and LLDAP under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run GLAuth and LLDAP with Docker?
GLAuth: yes. LLDAP: yes.