Glances vs Peekaping

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesPeekaping
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 1,169
First released20122024
ReplacesDatadogPingdom, Better Uptime

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Peekaping if…

  • Lightweight Go backend
  • Clean interface
Peekaping details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Peekaping better?

Neither is universally better. Glances has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Glances and Peekaping free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Peekaping under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Peekaping with Docker?

Glances: yes. Peekaping: yes.

Related comparisons