Glances vs NUT Exporter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesNUT Exporter
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 333
First released20122019
ReplacesDatadogAPC PowerChute

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose NUT Exporter if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
NUT Exporter details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or NUT Exporter better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider NUT Exporter if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and NUT Exporter free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and NUT Exporter under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and NUT Exporter with Docker?

Glances: yes. NUT Exporter: yes.

Related comparisons