Glances vs Netron

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesNetron
CategoryMonitoring & StatusWeb Analytics
LicenseLGPL-3.0MIT
LanguagePythonJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarybare-metal
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 33,323
First released20122026
ReplacesDatadog

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Netron if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 33.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Netron details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Netron better?

Neither is universally better. Netron has the larger community, while Glances is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Glances and Netron free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Netron under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Netron with Docker?

Glances: yes. Netron: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons