Glances vs Logstash

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted monitoring & status options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGlancesLogstash
CategoryMonitoring & StatusMonitoring & Status
LicenseLGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguagePythonJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 33,269★ 14,912
First released20122009
ReplacesDatadogFluentd

Why pick each one

Choose Glances if…

  • Very easy to run
  • Lightweight
  • Good single-host overview
Glances details

Choose Logstash if…

  • Powerful transformation language
  • Huge plugin library
Logstash details

Frequently asked questions

Is Glances or Logstash better?

Glances is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Logstash if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Glances and Logstash free and open-source?

Yes. Glances is licensed under LGPL-3.0 and Logstash under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Glances and Logstash with Docker?

Glances: yes. Logstash: yes.

Related comparisons