Gitu vs lazygit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureGitulazygit
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageRustGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 2,848★ 81,130
First released20242018
ReplacesGitKraken, SourcetreeGitKraken, Sourcetree

Why pick each one

Choose Gitu if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Rust
Gitu details

Choose lazygit if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 81.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazygit details

Frequently asked questions

Is Gitu or lazygit better?

Neither is universally better. lazygit has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Gitu and lazygit free and open-source?

Yes. Gitu is licensed under MIT and lazygit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Gitu and lazygit with Docker?

Gitu: check the project docs for container support. lazygit: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons