Forgejo Runner vs Pagure
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Forgejo Runner
CI runner for Forgejo Actions
VS
Pagure
Git-centered forge built by and for the Fedora community
| Feature | Forgejo Runner | Pagure |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 900 |
| First released | 2023 | 2015 |
| Replaces | GitHub Actions | GitHub, GitLab |
Why pick each one
Choose Forgejo Runner if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Forgejo Runner or Pagure better?
Neither is universally better. Pagure has the larger community, while Forgejo Runner is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Forgejo Runner and Pagure free and open-source?
Yes. Forgejo Runner is licensed under MIT and Pagure under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Forgejo Runner and Pagure with Docker?
Forgejo Runner: yes. Pagure: check the project docs for container support.