Forgejo Runner vs Apache Allura
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Forgejo Runner
CI runner for Forgejo Actions
VS
Apache Allura
Open-source forge for managing source code and projects
| Feature | Forgejo Runner | Apache Allura |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 300 | ★ 148 |
| First released | 2023 | 2012 |
| Replaces | GitHub Actions | GitHub, SourceForge |
Why pick each one
Choose Forgejo Runner if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Choose Apache Allura if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Forgejo Runner or Apache Allura better?
Forgejo Runner is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Apache Allura if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Forgejo Runner and Apache Allura free and open-source?
Yes. Forgejo Runner is licensed under MIT and Apache Allura under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Forgejo Runner and Apache Allura with Docker?
Forgejo Runner: yes. Apache Allura: yes.