Gitea Mirror Manager vs cgit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Gitea Mirror Manager
Automatically mirror GitHub repositories to a Gitea server
VS
cgit
Fast web interface for Git repositories
| Feature | Gitea Mirror Manager | cgit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,353 | ★ 800 |
| First released | 2024 | 2006 |
| Replaces | GitHub | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose Gitea Mirror Manager if…
- Keeps offline backups
- Simple configuration
Choose cgit if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea Mirror Manager or cgit better?
Gitea Mirror Manager is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider cgit if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Gitea Mirror Manager and cgit free and open-source?
Yes. Gitea Mirror Manager is licensed under MIT and cgit under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Gitea Mirror Manager and cgit with Docker?
Gitea Mirror Manager: yes. cgit: check the project docs for container support.