Agola vs Gitea Mirror Manager
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted git hosting & forges options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Agola
CI/CD redefined for cloud-native workflows
VS
Gitea Mirror Manager
Automatically mirror GitHub repositories to a Gitea server
| Feature | Agola | Gitea Mirror Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Git Hosting & Forges |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,622 | ★ 1,353 |
| First released | 2019 | 2024 |
| Replaces | Drone, GitHub Actions | GitHub |
Why pick each one
Choose Agola if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Active community (1.6k GitHub stars)
Choose Gitea Mirror Manager if…
- Keeps offline backups
- Simple configuration
Frequently asked questions
Is Agola or Gitea Mirror Manager better?
Neither is universally better. Agola has the larger community, while Gitea Mirror Manager is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Agola and Gitea Mirror Manager free and open-source?
Yes. Agola is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Gitea Mirror Manager under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Agola and Gitea Mirror Manager with Docker?
Agola: yes. Gitea Mirror Manager: yes.