OneDev vs Phabricator
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
OneDev
Self-hosted Git server with CI/CD and kanban
VS
Phabricator
Suite of web apps to build software faster
| Feature | OneDev | Phabricator |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Git Hosting & Forges | Developer Tools & Git |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Java | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 15,145 | ★ 12,299 |
| First released | 2016 | 2011 |
| Replaces | GitHub, GitLab | GitHub, Jira |
Why pick each one
Choose Phabricator if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Mature project with 12.3k GitHub stars
- Written in PHP
Frequently asked questions
Is OneDev or Phabricator better?
OneDev is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Phabricator if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are OneDev and Phabricator free and open-source?
Yes. OneDev is licensed under MIT and Phabricator under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run OneDev and Phabricator with Docker?
OneDev: yes. Phabricator: check the project docs for container support.