git-crypt vs YeetFile
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted password managers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
git-crypt
Transparent file encryption for secrets stored in git
VS
YeetFile
Encrypted file sharing and vault service
| Feature | git-crypt | YeetFile |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Password Managers | Password Managers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 32 MB | 50 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,837 | ★ 313 |
| First released | 2013 | 2025 |
| Replaces | HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager | Pastebin, ZeroBin |
Why pick each one
Choose YeetFile if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in Go
- Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is git-crypt or YeetFile better?
Neither is universally better. git-crypt has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are git-crypt and YeetFile free and open-source?
Yes. git-crypt is licensed under GPL-3.0 and YeetFile under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run git-crypt and YeetFile with Docker?
git-crypt: check the project docs for container support. YeetFile: check the project docs for container support.