git-annex vs SeaweedFS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregit-annexSeaweedFS
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0Apache-2.0
LanguageHaskellGo
Setup difficultyHardHard
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 2,000★ 33,952
First released20102015
ReplacesDropboxAmazon S3

Why pick each one

Choose git-annex if…

  • Excellent for large archives
  • Many remote backends
git-annex details

Choose SeaweedFS if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 34k GitHub stars
SeaweedFS details

Frequently asked questions

Is git-annex or SeaweedFS better?

Neither is universally better. SeaweedFS has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are git-annex and SeaweedFS free and open-source?

Yes. git-annex is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SeaweedFS under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run git-annex and SeaweedFS with Docker?

git-annex: check the project docs for container support. SeaweedFS: yes.

Related comparisons