File Browser vs git-annex

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFile Browsergit-annex
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseApache-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageGoHaskell
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarybare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 35,800★ 2,000
First released20172010
ReplacesDropboxDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose File Browser if…

  • Extremely lightweight
  • Trivial to deploy
  • Good for quick file access
File Browser details

Choose git-annex if…

  • Excellent for large archives
  • Many remote backends
git-annex details

Frequently asked questions

Is File Browser or git-annex better?

File Browser is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider git-annex if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are File Browser and git-annex free and open-source?

Yes. File Browser is licensed under Apache-2.0 and git-annex under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run File Browser and git-annex with Docker?

File Browser: yes. git-annex: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons