git-annex vs Puter

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregit-annexPuter
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageHaskellTypeScript
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binarydocker
GitHub stars★ 2,000★ 43,003
First released20102026
ReplacesDropbox

Why pick each one

Choose git-annex if…

  • Excellent for large archives
  • Many remote backends
git-annex details

Choose Puter if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 43k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
Puter details

Frequently asked questions

Is git-annex or Puter better?

Puter is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider git-annex if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are git-annex and Puter free and open-source?

Yes. git-annex is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Puter under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run git-annex and Puter with Docker?

git-annex: check the project docs for container support. Puter: yes.

Related comparisons