gandi-livedns vs Traefik

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregandi-livednsTraefik
CategoryReverse Proxy & GatewaysReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicensefreeMIT
LanguageShellGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM512 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, one-clickdocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 31★ 64,330
First released20232015
ReplacesHAProxy, AWS ELB

Why pick each one

Choose gandi-livedns if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Written in Shell
gandi-livedns details

Choose Traefik if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 64.3k GitHub stars
Traefik details

Frequently asked questions

Is gandi-livedns or Traefik better?

Neither is universally better. Traefik has the larger community, while gandi-livedns is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are gandi-livedns and Traefik free and open-source?

Yes. gandi-livedns is licensed under free and Traefik under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gandi-livedns and Traefik with Docker?

gandi-livedns: yes. Traefik: yes.

Related comparisons