gandi-livedns vs NPS
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted reverse proxy & gateways options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
gandi-livedns
Update your Gandi DNS zone records with your WAN IP
VS
NPS
Lightweight proxy server for intranet penetration
| Feature | gandi-livedns | NPS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Reverse Proxy & Gateways | Reverse Proxy & Gateways |
| License | free | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Shell | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 31 | ★ 34,157 |
| First released | 2023 | 2019 |
| Replaces | — | ngrok |
Why pick each one
Choose gandi-livedns if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Written in Shell
Choose NPS if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is gandi-livedns or NPS better?
Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community, while gandi-livedns is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are gandi-livedns and NPS free and open-source?
Yes. gandi-livedns is licensed under free and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run gandi-livedns and NPS with Docker?
gandi-livedns: yes. NPS: yes.