gallery-dl vs Photoview

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregallery-dlPhotoview
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseGPL-2.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 19,143★ 6,496
First released20152019
ReplacesManual downloadsGoogle Photos

Why pick each one

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Choose Photoview if…

  • Uses your folder structure
  • Lightweight
  • Easy setup
Photoview details

Frequently asked questions

Is gallery-dl or Photoview better?

Neither is universally better. gallery-dl has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are gallery-dl and Photoview free and open-source?

Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Photoview under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gallery-dl and Photoview with Docker?

gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. Photoview: yes.

Related comparisons