gallery-dl vs LibrePhotos

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted photo management options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
Featuregallery-dlLibrePhotos
CategoryPhoto ManagementPhoto Management
LicenseGPL-2.0MIT
LanguagePythonPython
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbare-metal, binary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 19,143★ 8,021
First released20152020
ReplacesManual downloadsGoogle Photos

Why pick each one

Choose gallery-dl if…

  • Supports hundreds of sites
  • Very actively maintained
gallery-dl details

Choose LibrePhotos if…

  • Smart organization features
  • Permissive license
  • Privacy-friendly
LibrePhotos details

Frequently asked questions

Is gallery-dl or LibrePhotos better?

gallery-dl is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider LibrePhotos if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are gallery-dl and LibrePhotos free and open-source?

Yes. gallery-dl is licensed under GPL-2.0 and LibrePhotos under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run gallery-dl and LibrePhotos with Docker?

gallery-dl: check the project docs for container support. LibrePhotos: yes.

Related comparisons