fx vs Zola
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
fx
Micro-blog tool offering built-in syntax highlighting, mobile
VS
Zola
Fast static site engine in a single binary
| Feature | fx | Zola |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 323 | ★ 17,308 |
| First released | 2026 | 2017 |
| Replaces | — | WordPress, Medium |
Why pick each one
Choose fx if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is fx or Zola better?
Neither is universally better. Zola has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are fx and Zola free and open-source?
Yes. fx is licensed under MIT and Zola under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run fx and Zola with Docker?
fx: yes. Zola: check the project docs for container support.