Astro vs fx
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted blogging platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Astro
Modern static site framework for content-driven sites
VS
fx
Micro-blog tool offering built-in syntax highlighting, mobile
| Feature | Astro | fx |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Blogging Platforms | Blogging Platforms |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | TypeScript | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 61,631 | ★ 323 |
| First released | 2021 | 2026 |
| Replaces | WordPress, Medium | — |
Why pick each one
Choose fx if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Rust
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Astro or fx better?
Neither is universally better. Astro has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Astro and fx free and open-source?
Yes. Astro is licensed under MIT and fx under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Astro and fx with Docker?
Astro: check the project docs for container support. fx: yes.