frp vs Webtop
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
VS
Webtop
Containerized full Linux desktop accessible from a browser
| Feature | frp | Webtop |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Shell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 108,622 | ★ 4,319 |
| First released | 2016 | 2021 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Kasm Workspaces |
Why pick each one
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Webtop if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or Webtop better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while Webtop is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are frp and Webtop free and open-source?
Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Webtop under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run frp and Webtop with Docker?
frp: yes. Webtop: yes.