frp vs ttyd
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | frp | ttyd |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | C |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 108,622 | ★ 12,165 |
| First released | 2016 | 2016 |
| Replaces | ngrok | PuTTY |
Why pick each one
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose ttyd if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 12.2k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or ttyd better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while ttyd is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are frp and ttyd free and open-source?
Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ttyd under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run frp and ttyd with Docker?
frp: yes. ttyd: yes.