frp vs trzsz
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
VS
trzsz
File transfer over SSH with progress and resume
| Feature | frp | trzsz |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Go | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 108,622 | ★ 1,439 |
| First released | 2016 | 2022 |
| Replaces | ngrok | lrzsz, SCP |
Why pick each one
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose trzsz if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or trzsz better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community, while trzsz is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are frp and trzsz free and open-source?
Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and trzsz under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run frp and trzsz with Docker?
frp: yes. trzsz: check the project docs for container support.