frp vs NPS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturefrpNPS
CategoryRemote Access & VPNReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseApache-2.0GPL-3.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, dockerdocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 108,622★ 34,157
First released20162019
Replacesngrokngrok

Why pick each one

Choose frp if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
frp details

Choose NPS if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
NPS details

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or NPS better?

Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are frp and NPS free and open-source?

Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run frp and NPS with Docker?

frp: yes. NPS: yes.

Related comparisons