frp vs Neko
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
frp
Fast reverse proxy to expose local servers behind NAT
VS
Neko
Self-hosted virtual browser running in Docker
| Feature | frp | Neko |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | binary, docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 108,622 | ★ 21,884 |
| First released | 2016 | 2020 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Browserling |
Why pick each one
Choose frp if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 108.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Choose Neko if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 21.9k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is frp or Neko better?
Neither is universally better. frp has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are frp and Neko free and open-source?
Yes. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Neko under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run frp and Neko with Docker?
frp: yes. Neko: yes.