Frigate Mobile Companion vs Neolink
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Mobile Companion
Network video recorder front-end for review and clips
VS
Neolink
RTSP bridge for Reolink cameras without cloud
| Feature | Frigate Mobile Companion | Neolink |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | HTML | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,150 | ★ 775 |
| First released | 2015 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Wowza | Reolink Cloud |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Mobile Companion if…
- Easy to publish camera feeds
- Polished interface
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Mobile Companion or Neolink better?
Frigate Mobile Companion is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Neolink if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Frigate Mobile Companion and Neolink free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Mobile Companion is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Neolink under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Mobile Companion and Neolink with Docker?
Frigate Mobile Companion: yes. Neolink: yes.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Agent DVR
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs WebRTC Camera
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Ant Media Server Community Edition
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Bluecherry
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs camera-streamer
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Cameradar
- Neolink vs Cameradar
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs Camera.UI
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs CodeProject.AI Server
- Frigate Mobile Companion vs CompreFace
- Neolink vs CompreFace