Frigate vs Mozilla WebThings Gateway
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted home automation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
| Feature | Frigate | Mozilla WebThings Gateway |
|---|---|---|
| Deploy effort | Under-an-hour setup | Under-an-hour setup |
| Health score | 99 · Excellent | 81 · Excellent |
| Category | Home Automation | Home Automation |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | bare-metal, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 36,071 | ★ 2,646 |
| First released | 2020 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Google Home | SmartThings, Google Home |
What are Frigate and Mozilla WebThings Gateway?
Frigate
Frigate is a local network video recorder with real-time AI object detection optimized for use with Home Assistant. It targets users wanting private, intelligent camera monitoring. It is deployed via Docker.
- Real-time AI object detection
- Coral TPU acceleration support
- Tight Home Assistant integration
- Local-only processing
Mozilla WebThings Gateway
WebThings Gateway is an open-source gateway for monitoring and controlling smart home devices over the web using open standards. Originating at Mozilla, it now continues as a community project.
- Web of Things standards
- Add-on device support
- Rules engine
- Local web interface
Frigate vs Mozilla WebThings Gateway: key differences
Frigate is written in Python, while Mozilla WebThings Gateway is built with TypeScript. Licensing differs — MIT for Frigate versus MPL-2.0 for Mozilla WebThings Gateway. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is the lighter option, starting around 512 MB of RAM against 2,048 MB for Frigate. Mozilla WebThings Gateway is the more established project (first released 2018), while Frigate arrived in 2020. Frigate has the considerably larger community, at 36,071 GitHub stars versus 2,646.
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate if…
- Smart local NVR
- Great with Home Assistant
- Privacy-friendly
Watch out for
- Benefits from a TPU
- Configuration is involved
Choose Mozilla WebThings Gateway if…
- Open standards-based
- Privacy-focused
Watch out for
- Smaller community after Mozilla
- Fewer integrations than HA
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate or Mozilla WebThings Gateway better?
Neither is universally better. Frigate has the larger community, while Mozilla WebThings Gateway is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Frigate and Mozilla WebThings Gateway free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate is licensed under MIT and Mozilla WebThings Gateway under MPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate and Mozilla WebThings Gateway with Docker?
Frigate: yes. Mozilla WebThings Gateway: yes.
Which is lighter on resources, Frigate or Mozilla WebThings Gateway?
Mozilla WebThings Gateway has the smaller minimum footprint at 512 MB of RAM, compared to about 2,048 MB for Frigate. Real-world usage depends on library size, user count, and enabled features.
Related comparisons
- Frigate vs Gladys Assistant
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Gladys Assistant
- Frigate vs Home Assistant
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Home Assistant
- Frigate vs openHAB
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs openHAB
- Frigate vs Scrypted
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Scrypted
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs AppDaemon
- Mozilla WebThings Gateway vs Domoticz