Frigate Notify vs CameraView
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video surveillance options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Frigate Notify
Standalone notification tool for Frigate NVR events
VS
CameraView
Android library for camera capture and streaming apps
| Feature | Frigate Notify | CameraView |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Surveillance | Video Surveillance |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Go | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 399 | ★ 5,128 |
| First released | 2023 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Nest Cam | Proprietary camera SDKs |
Why pick each one
Choose Frigate Notify if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Frigate Notify or CameraView better?
Neither is universally better. CameraView has the larger community, while Frigate Notify is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Frigate Notify and CameraView free and open-source?
Yes. Frigate Notify is licensed under MIT and CameraView under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Frigate Notify and CameraView with Docker?
Frigate Notify: yes. CameraView: check the project docs for container support.
Related comparisons
- Frigate Notify vs Cameradar
- CameraView vs Cameradar
- Frigate Notify vs Camera.UI
- CameraView vs Camera.UI
- Frigate Notify vs CompreFace
- CameraView vs CompreFace
- Frigate Notify vs Double Take
- CameraView vs Double Take
- Frigate Notify vs Sighthound Surveillance Station
- CameraView vs Sighthound Surveillance Station