Framagames vs Nakama

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted game servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFramagamesNakama
CategoryGame ServersGame Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0-onlyApache-2.0
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM50 MB512 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, kubernetes, binary
GitHub stars★ 13,121
First released20232017
ReplacesPlayFab, Firebase

Why pick each one

Choose Framagames if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0-only license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Framagames details

Choose Nakama if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 13.1k GitHub stars
Nakama details

Frequently asked questions

Is Framagames or Nakama better?

Neither is universally better. Nakama has the larger community, while Framagames is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Framagames and Nakama free and open-source?

Yes. Framagames is licensed under AGPL-3.0-only and Nakama under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Framagames and Nakama with Docker?

Framagames: check the project docs for container support. Nakama: yes.

Related comparisons