Framadate vs hitobito
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted calendar & contacts options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Framadate
Online polling and meeting scheduling tool
VS
hitobito
Manage complex group hierarchies with members, events and a lot more
| Feature | Framadate | hitobito |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Calendar & Contacts | Calendar & Contacts |
| License | CECILL-B | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 600 | ★ 475 |
| First released | 2011 | 2026 |
| Replaces | Doodle | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Framadate if…
- Released under the CECILL-B license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in PHP
Choose hitobito if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Framadate or hitobito better?
Framadate is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider hitobito if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Framadate and hitobito free and open-source?
Yes. Framadate is licensed under CECILL-B and hitobito under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Framadate and hitobito with Docker?
Framadate: yes. hitobito: check the project docs for container support.