Foswiki vs TiddlyWiki
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Foswiki
Structured wiki and enterprise collaboration platform
VS
TiddlyWiki
A non-linear personal web notebook in a single file
| Feature | Foswiki | TiddlyWiki |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | Perl | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | binary, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 118 | ★ 8,622 |
| First released | 2008 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Confluence | Notion, OneNote |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Foswiki or TiddlyWiki better?
TiddlyWiki is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Foswiki if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Foswiki and TiddlyWiki free and open-source?
Yes. Foswiki is licensed under GPL-3.0 and TiddlyWiki under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Foswiki and TiddlyWiki with Docker?
Foswiki: yes. TiddlyWiki: check the project docs for container support.