Foswiki vs Gollum
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted wikis & documentation options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Foswiki
Structured wiki and enterprise collaboration platform
VS
Gollum
A simple, Git-powered wiki with a sweet API
| Feature | Foswiki | Gollum |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Wikis & Documentation | Wikis & Documentation |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker, source | binary, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 118 | ★ 14,308 |
| First released | 2008 | 2010 |
| Replaces | Confluence | Confluence, Notion |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Foswiki or Gollum better?
Gollum is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Foswiki if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Foswiki and Gollum free and open-source?
Yes. Foswiki is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Gollum under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Foswiki and Gollum with Docker?
Foswiki: yes. Gollum: yes.