Fossil vs lazygit

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFossillazygit
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseMIT
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 600★ 81,130
First released20062018
ReplacesGitHub, GitGitKraken, Sourcetree

Why pick each one

Choose Fossil if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Fossil details

Choose lazygit if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 81.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazygit details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fossil or lazygit better?

Neither is universally better. lazygit has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Fossil and lazygit free and open-source?

Yes. Fossil is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and lazygit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fossil and lazygit with Docker?

Fossil: check the project docs for container support. lazygit: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons