Penpot vs Fossil

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturePenpotFossil
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMPL-2.0BSD-2-Clause
LanguageClojureC
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM2,048 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, kubernetesbinary, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 58,249★ 600
First released20202006
ReplacesFigmaGitHub, Git

Why pick each one

Choose Penpot if…

  • Released under the MPL-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 58.2k GitHub stars
Penpot details

Choose Fossil if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Fossil details

Frequently asked questions

Is Penpot or Fossil better?

Neither is universally better. Penpot has the larger community, while Fossil is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Penpot and Fossil free and open-source?

Yes. Penpot is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Fossil under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Penpot and Fossil with Docker?

Penpot: yes. Fossil: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons