Fossil vs lazydocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFossillazydocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseBSD-2-ClauseMIT
LanguageCGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metalbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 600★ 52,348
First released20062019
ReplacesGitHub, GitDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Fossil if…

  • Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in C
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Fossil details

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Fossil or lazydocker better?

Neither is universally better. lazydocker has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Fossil and lazydocker free and open-source?

Yes. Fossil is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and lazydocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Fossil and lazydocker with Docker?

Fossil: check the project docs for container support. lazydocker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons