Fooocus vs SD.Next
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fooocus
Simplified Stable Diffusion image generation with minimal setup
VS
SD.Next
Advanced all-in-one generative image and video studio
| Feature | Fooocus | SD.Next |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Image Generation | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | bare-metal, source, docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 52,089 | ★ 7,224 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Midjourney | Midjourney |
Why pick each one
Choose Fooocus if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Mature project with 52.1k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Choose SD.Next if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.2k GitHub stars
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is Fooocus or SD.Next better?
Fooocus is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SD.Next if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Fooocus and SD.Next free and open-source?
Yes. Fooocus is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SD.Next under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fooocus and SD.Next with Docker?
Fooocus: check the project docs for container support. SD.Next: yes.