Focalboard vs Tracks
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Focalboard
Open-source project and task management boards
VS
Tracks
GTD-style to-do list and personal organizer
| Feature | Focalboard | Tracks |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 26,376 | ★ 1,238 |
| First released | 2021 | 2004 |
| Replaces | Trello, Asana, Notion | Todoist, OmniFocus |
Why pick each one
Choose Tracks if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Ruby
Frequently asked questions
Is Focalboard or Tracks better?
Focalboard is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Tracks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Focalboard and Tracks free and open-source?
Yes. Focalboard is licensed under MIT and Tracks under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Focalboard and Tracks with Docker?
Focalboard: yes. Tracks: yes.