Focalboard vs SCM Manager
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted project management & tasks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Focalboard
Open-source project and task management boards
VS
SCM Manager
The easiest way to share and manage your Git, Mercurial and Subversion
| Feature | Focalboard | SCM Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Project Management & Tasks | Project Management & Tasks |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 26,376 | ★ 176 |
| First released | 2021 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Trello, Asana, Notion | — |
Why pick each one
Choose SCM Manager if…
- Released under the BSD-3-Clause license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Written in Java
Frequently asked questions
Is Focalboard or SCM Manager better?
Focalboard is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SCM Manager if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Focalboard and SCM Manager free and open-source?
Yes. Focalboard is licensed under MIT and SCM Manager under BSD-3-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Focalboard and SCM Manager with Docker?
Focalboard: yes. SCM Manager: yes.