Flying Carpet vs Nextcloud

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureFlying CarpetNextcloud
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageRustPHP
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, snap
GitHub stars★ 5,266★ 36,362
First released20172016
ReplacesAirDrop, SnapdropDropbox, Google Drive, Microsoft 365

Why pick each one

Choose Flying Carpet if…

  • Works fully offline
  • Cross-platform including mobile
Flying Carpet details

Choose Nextcloud if…

  • Feature-rich and extensible
  • Active development and large community
  • Integrates calendar, contacts and office
Nextcloud details

Frequently asked questions

Is Flying Carpet or Nextcloud better?

Neither is universally better. Nextcloud has the larger community, while Flying Carpet is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Flying Carpet and Nextcloud free and open-source?

Yes. Flying Carpet is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Nextcloud under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Flying Carpet and Nextcloud with Docker?

Flying Carpet: check the project docs for container support. Nextcloud: yes.

Related comparisons