Fizzy vs Pixelfed
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Fizzy
Kanban as it should be. Not as it has been
VS
Pixelfed
Federated photo-sharing social platform
| Feature | Fizzy | Pixelfed |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | free | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Ruby | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, one-click | docker, bare-metal, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 8,038 | ★ 7,055 |
| First released | 2022 | 2018 |
| Replaces | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Fizzy if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Fizzy or Pixelfed better?
Fizzy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Pixelfed if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Fizzy and Pixelfed free and open-source?
Yes. Fizzy is licensed under free and Pixelfed under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Fizzy and Pixelfed with Docker?
Fizzy: yes. Pixelfed: yes.