Artalk vs Fizzy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted social networks options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Artalk
Comment system built in Golang, providing a lightweight and highly
VS
Fizzy
Kanban as it should be. Not as it has been
| Feature | Artalk | Fizzy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Social Networks | Social Networks |
| License | MIT | free |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker, one-click |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,312 | ★ 8,038 |
| First released | 2026 | 2022 |
| Replaces | — | — |
Why pick each one
Choose Artalk if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (2.3k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Choose Fizzy if…
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- One-click install on common self-host platforms
- Mature project with 8k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Artalk or Fizzy better?
Fizzy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Artalk if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Artalk and Fizzy free and open-source?
Yes. Artalk is licensed under MIT and Fizzy under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Artalk and Fizzy with Docker?
Artalk: yes. Fizzy: yes.